Court grants 11 intervener applications, dismisses one in Bill 137 appeal

An application made by Our Duty Canada, self-described as “a network for parents of children and adolescents captured by gender ideation,” was dismissed. The appeal is set to be heard on Sept. 23.

Published Jul 26, 2024  •  Last updated Jul 26, 2024  •  3 minute read

Youth from various high schools in Regina stage a rally outside the Saskatchewan Legislative Building due to a provincial pronoun consent policy on Oct. 17, 2023 in Regina. Photo by KAYLE NEIS /Regina Leader-Post

Eleven applications for intervener status in the Saskatchewan government’s appeal of a constitutional challenge against its pronoun consent law (Bill 137) have been granted.

The lone application to be dismissed was made by Our Duty Canada (ODC), self-described as “a network for parents of children and adolescents captured by gender ideation.”

The written decision, signed by Chief Justice of the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal Robert Leurer, as well as by Justices Neal Caldwell and Lian Schwann, was released Friday, less than two days after they heard from the applicants. It outlines several reasons to deny ODC its request for intervener status, including that it says nothing about the organization’s interest in the constitutional issues raised by the province in the appeal.

THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY

Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.

  • Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account.
  • Get exclusive access to the Regina Leader-Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on.
  • Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists.
  • Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists.
  • Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.

SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES

Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.

  • Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account.
  • Get exclusive access to the Regina Leader-Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on.
  • Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists.
  • Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists.
  • Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.

REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

  • Access articles from across Canada with one account.
  • Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.
  • Enjoy additional articles per month.
  • Get email updates from your favourite authors.

Sign In or Create an Account

or

Article content

“At best, ODC would offer no perspective on the constitutional issues that are alive in this appeal that is not already before the Court,” the decision stated. “At worst, ODC’s intervention would serve to direct the Court’s time and attention to matters that will not affect the outcome of the appeal, thus causing prejudice of the parties and the judicial process more generally.”

The 11 successful applicants include the governments of New Brunswick and Alberta, both of which have adopted similar pronoun policies to Saskatchewan. The other interveners are: The Advocates’ Society, Amnesty International Canadian Section, British Columbia Civil Liberties Association, Canadian Civil Liberties Association, John Howard Society of Saskatchewan, Justice for Children and Youth, Trial Lawyers Association of British Columbia, the Women’s Legal Education and Action Fund Inc., and a joint application from the Saskatchewan Federation of Labour (SFL), Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) and Canadian Teachers’ Federation (CTF).

At the heart of the constitutional challenge is Bill 137, commonly called the pronoun consent law, which requires students under 16 to have parent or guardian permission to use a new gender-related preferred name or set of pronouns in schools.

By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.

Article content

Article content

UR Pride Centre for Sexuality and Gender Diversity filed a legal challenge against the policy last year, alleging it violates sections 2, 7, 12 and 15 of Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms and Saskatchewan’s Human Rights Code. Court of King’s Bench Justice Michael Megaw allowed the litigation to continue in February on the grounds of declaratory relief, prompting an appeal from the province.

Recommended from Editorial

  1. Multiple groups request intervener status in legal action on Sask. pronoun policy

  2. Sask. education minister received 75 letters in immediate wake of pronoun policy

  3. Letters: Pronoun debate sparks human, transgender rights concerns

The nine organizations, plus two provincial governments, outline in the application process the perspective they will bring “in connection with the issues in this appeal,” the decision noted, and several “helpfully” filed draft factums to support their applications which “offer even greater clarity of position.”

They have also assured the court that “they will not be duplicative of the parties’ arguments in their submissions.”

Article content

“We accept those assurances from them,” read the decision. “We are persuaded therefore to grant intervener status … as their involvement will tend to assist this Court to carry out its appellate function without expanding the scope of the appeal.”

In an attempt to ensure the successful applicants will not “unduly delay the proceedings or otherwise cause prejudice to the parties,” the decision presented a number of conditions which include but are not limited to the following:

The factums must not exceed 15 pages in length and must be served on the parties and all other interveners and filed by 4 p.m. on Aug. 16, 2024; the SFL, CUPE and CTF will be treated as a single intervener and file one factum; the Saskatchewan government and UR Pride are each entitled to one factum no longer than 40 pages replying to the factums filed by the interveners and filed by 4 p.m. on Sept. 6, 2024; and the interveners “shall accept the record as it is.”

The appeal is set to be heard on Sept. 23, 2024.

— with files from Larissa Kurz and Brandon Harder

jackerman@postmedia.com

The Regina Leader-Post has created an Afternoon Headlines newsletter that can be delivered daily to your inbox so you are up to date with the most vital news of the day. Click here to subscribe.

With some online platforms blocking access to the journalism upon which you depend, our website is your destination for up-to-the-minute news, so make sure to bookmark leaderpost.com and sign up for our newsletters so we can keep you informed. Click here to subscribe.

Article content

Read More

Related posts

SIX and Chainlink Take €2 Trillion in Swiss and Spanish Equities Data Onchain

Free 16-Week Mentorship Programme with Soho House Opens Applications for Brighton’s Working-Class Creatives

S.Pellegrino Young Chef Academy Applications Now Open